So I wrote a very controversial blog post about it.
And this week that blog post has gotten a lot of attention, given his recently admitted “transgressions”.
What did I say back in 2007?
Well, back then, I said he’s NOT on steroids.
But given his recent behavior and clear lack of judgment…now I’m starting to reconsider.
Could I have been wrong about Tiger’s muscle-building all along?
I still think it IS possible for him to have gained that amount of muscle NATURALLY.
In fact, back then I said…
“Anyone who thinks Tiger Woods is on steroids has never been in a gym. Has never lifted weights. Has no idea of the potential of the human body to adapt to training.”
Not surprisingly, that created a LOT of controversy, and some of the blog comments from anonymous readers are downright nasty and contain strong language, so be warned if you want to check my original blog post out here:
Essentially, my argument was this…
1) Tiger isn’t “that” big, and not much bigger than me
2) I’ve never used steroids
3) Therefore, I don’t believe Tiger needed to use steroids
And I still believe that, but last week someone made an interesting comment on the blog and about my photo, writing:
Interesting…so here are 3 scenarios…
1) Could the differences in our bodies be due to the bodyweight exercises in my program giving me a more “natural” look while Tiger has done more weight training – and looks bulky?
2) Could the differences simply be due to the way we each genetically respond to training?
3) Could he really be on steroids?
In the end, I’m sticking to my original belief that Tiger did NOT use steroids to build muscle.
And that my workouts – particularly the bodyweight exercises used in my Bodyweight Bodybuilding type workouts – give me a better looking, all-natural beach body.
Craig Ballantyne, CTT
Author, TT Bodyweight Bodybuilding