The Internet's Most Popular Wealth, Health and Wisdom EZine
Comments/Questions: 1-866-344-7200
www.earlytorise.com
Message #1773
Wednesday, July 5, 2006
  • WEALTHY: Tired of getting put "on hold"? Good! (Robert Ringer)
  • HEALTHY: Starch or sweet - which is the real enemy? (Dr. Al Sears)

  • WISE: Bo Bennett on finding opportunity

ALSO IN THIS ISSUE:

  • 3 ways to manage computer files

  • Add "avaricious" to your vocabulary

* Highly Recommended *

Nine Ways To Explode More Profits

This week my colleague Jay Abraham is practically giving away a revolutionary business growth system for pennies-on-the dollar.

Jay will send you a comprehensive business growth system, containing some of his best money-making ideas, methods and concepts to study, apply and prosper from... and he will only charge you a modest processing fee to get it produced, packed and shipped off to you.

Jay receives $5,000 per hour for his consulting... and that's when you can get him. A full day would run you $40,000! His tape sets alone normally sell from $500 to $2,000, and live training programs range from $5,000 to as much as $25,000 for a single event.

If you want to start making a ton more money and have a clear, direct path to real prosperity and business wealth, you owe it to yourself to look into this program.

- Patrick Coffey


"The only place opportunity cannot be found is in a closed-minded person."

- Bo Bennett

More on Recasting

By Robert Ringer

I rarely write about the same subject twice in a row. Today, however, I'm going to make an exception. I just read an article in Time that was too good to pass up, because it so well underscores what I said in my last article for ETR about unconventional thinkers who recast businesses in their own image.

In that article, I discussed how Steve Wynn transformed the Las Vegas hotel industry into one of luxurious, self-contained mega-resorts. And how Howard Schultz turned a coffee-bean retailer into the Starbucks worldwide chain of designer coffee shops.

Now, along comes Tomas Maier, creative director of Bottega Veneta, the high-end Italian leather-goods retailer. Bottega Veneta is owned by PPR, parent company to many other luxury brands, including Gucci and Yves Saint Laurent.

Playing the maverick role to the hilt, Maier made the decision to take Bottega Veneta in a direction that's completely opposite that of the rest of the world of high fashion. The theme of his recasting can be summed up in one of my favorite words: understatement. And Maier is making it work.

He opened 18 Bottega Veneta stores last year, with 10 more planned for 2006. Sales skyrocketed 66 percent in 2005 to $190 million, and are expected to hit $238 million this year.

What I like about Tomas Maier's design-and-marketing philosophy is his belief that high quality wins out over splashy logos - a concept that ties to Bottega Veneta's slogan, initiated back in 1966 by the company's founders: "When your own initials are enough."

Maier's strategy is almost unthinkable in this day and age of in-your-face marketing. He banks on big-spending customers being smart enough to recognize quality rather than logos. And when you're selling handbags that cost from $2,000 to $75,000, your quality had better be very high.

Believe it or not, in my early twenties I actually designed men's outerwear. Most of my ideas were pretty radical, even though I came up short on the talent side of the equation. Still, I've always felt that the trend toward company logos on clothes and accessories is demeaning to the customer, because it turns him or her into a human billboard - and I've openly expressed my displeasure. (I even have a Tommy Hilfiger doll nailed to a dartboard on my office wall.)

The phenomenon of logo-saturated apparel could rightly be referred to as the Yuk Parade: Abercrombie & Fitch... Nautica... Banana Republic... Gap... Gucci. Heck, even Cheeburger, Cheeburger sells T-shirts with its name and logo on them.

Notwithstanding this tacky approach to marketing, I make it a habit to focus on the opportunities inherent in every bad situation. And what I see here are endless opportunities for imaginative entrepreneurs to buck this trend and carve out a big slice of pie for themselves in their respective industries. When everyone has "Me, too" on the brain, it's an open invitation for someone to come in and attract both attention and customers by implementing a contrarian approach.

As a rule, I try to avoid making predictions. So many complex factors are at play in today's increasingly insane world that it makes predicting the future a high-odds proposition, at best. Nevertheless, I am compelled to opine that in the not-too-distant future, an army of contrarian entrepreneurs will go against the grain of today's accepted standard operating procedures for customer service in virtually every industry.

Everyone reading this article has had more than his share of frustrating experiences trying to get a customer-service rep on the phone. What you get instead are robotic voices that make it clear the company totally disregards the value of your time. Consider:

  • Robotic, lying voices that tell you they appreciate your business, but are "currently experiencing an unusually high volume of calls."
  • Robotic, lying voices that tell you to press a number on your telephone keypad to speak to a company rep, only to be funneled into another voice hole with six or seven new options.
  • Robotic, audacious voices urging you to go to the company's website for answers. (Meaning, "Leave us alone.")
  • Robotic, insulting voices leading you from menu to menu to menu ... often in a loop that takes you back to where you began.
  • Robotic, rude voices that say, "Sorry, but you have pressed an invalid number. Goodbye." Click ... they're gone. From the company's viewpoint, you were the equivalent of a crank call.

Now, put on your entrepreneur's cap and think about this modern-day nightmare for a moment. One hundred percent of the buying public hates being victimized by the audio torture chambers that practically all companies now use. Hint: Where there are unhappy customers, there is also a business opportunity.

So, my big prediction is that new companies in virtually every industry will spring up in the coming five to 10 years that will offer, for a slightly higher price, something novel: real, live customer-service reps who will quickly answer your call and actually speak with you. They will be highly paid, well-trained people who will not "redirect" your call to a robotic voice that leads you on a wild goose chase or just hangs up on you.

Would you pay an extra $5 a month to a telephone company that offered this kind of service? I would. Or $10 more for a computer that would free you from the Dell, Hewlett-Packard, et al. robotic-voice mazes?

There are a handful of companies that still use live customer-service reps, but they are shrinking in number every day. Soon, the last of the holdouts will get on board, and that's when the pendulum will swing back in the other direction.

If you analogize it to the stock market, the customer-service situation in businesses across the board has just about hit bottom. And at or near the bottom of a cycle is the best time to invest.

If you already own a business, I suggest that it may be time to start thinking about investing in a live customer-service department. Then, use this valuable service as your most persuasive marketing tool.

Likewise, if you don't own a business but are thinking about starting one, consider how easily you could set yourself apart from the competition through a marketing campaign that boasts about your emphasis on respecting your customer's time. I'd wager that if Tomas Maier were in your shoes, he'd be doing just that.

Stories of nonconformists who ignore conventional-wisdom business models and recast entire industries can be found daily in magazines and newspapers that are readily at your disposal. Read as many of these stories as you possibly can, because they will help expand your mental paradigm and get your creative juices flowing. After that, it's up to you to formulate a plan and to implement your ideas by taking action.

At the same time, make it a point to resist hanging on every word spewed out by industry experts. True, successful people usually have a great deal of knowledge about their businesses. Nevertheless, I know from personal experience that once a person becomes successful and entrenched in any field of endeavor, it becomes more and more difficult for him to have an open mind when it comes to fresh and exciting new ideas - especially ideas that have to do with recasting his existing industry.

[Ed. Note: Not sure how to revive, recast, and create a whole "new" and profitable industry? Check out Robert's personal-development books on CD. And if you are not presently a subscriber to Robert Ringer's insightful, wisdom-filled e-letter, A Voice of Sanity in an Insane World, CLICK HERE to sign up for your free subscription.]


* Advertisement *

You Are Just Three Hours Away From Getting Everything You Want in Life...

All It Requires Is That You Do Something...

NOW!

Click here to learn how to get your hands on the most inspirational CD set ever created.


An Easier Way to Get Lean

By Al Sears, MD

Yesterday, you read how the glycemic index can surprise you. Some foods that are touted as "healthy" - like some cereals - can be worse for you than candy bars. That's because the glycemic index measures the blood sugar produced by different foods, and some cereals produce much more blood sugar than some candy bars.

Today, I have an even bigger surprise. Nearly everyone reporting on this important measurement has misinterpreted it, introduced bias, come to a wrong conclusion, and ignored the real lesson.

How can that happen? "Glycemic" means "sweet" - and the glycemic index can't seem to shake this association with sweetness. Yet real data show very little connection between the sweetness of a food and its glycemic index. Some of the sweetest foods have a very low glycemic index - cherries, for instance, measure 22. Potatoes and cornbread are not sweet but top the index at 100, because starchy foods release much more sugar into your blood.

So the glycemic index is not about sweetness but starchiness. Still, you can hardly read about the glycemic index without running up against the advice to "eat low-glycemic carbohydrates like whole grains." Even the USDA's new Food Pyramid makes this nonsensical recommendation. (Have you ever seen a non-starchy grain?)

So forget the misinterpretation and bad advice. If you choose naturally occurring foods, you can indulge your sweet tooth. The most reliable way to lose fat is to eat foods with a glycemic index below 40 until you achieve your desired leanness. To avoid the common bias, my Wellness Research Foundation and I developed our own glycemic index for our patients. You can get your free copy here.

Tomorrow, I'll explain how you can use fat to get lean.

[Ed. Note: Dr. Sears, a practicing physician and the author of The Doctor's Heart Cure, is a leading authority on longevity, physical fitness, and heart health.]


Notes From Asia: Our "Spoiled Child" Reputation

By Michael Masterson

When we asked our guides what the Chinese people think of Americans, we got a variety of answers.

Billy in Beijing said, "We like the people but we don't like your government." Patty in Xian agreed. And Roger in Shanghai said, "Americans like to express their feelings. This is not the Chinese way. But our government says only good things about yours. They want us to have good feelings about America."

America has, for a long time, been viewed by much of the world as a sort of spoiled, oversized child that acts rudely in other people's homes. This negative perception has been balanced by the positive qualities Americans generally exhibit: friendliness, frankness, and generosity. (We top the world as tippers, our guides have told us. On the bottom? New Zealanders.)

Since the war on terror began, our world image has definitely suffered. Our traditional image as well-meaning brats has morphed ominously into something more sinister: unprincipled, avaricious monsters.

When I travel, I expect people to like me, but I am cognizant of the fact that, as an American, I might be judged with a degree of suspicion. I try to overcome that suspicion by living up to my countrymen's reputation for frankness, friendliness, and generosity. But the most important rule for getting along in foreign lands, I've learned, is the same rule for getting along in America: Be mannerly.

Displaying good manners is a much overlooked but highly important technique for getting along with others and developing sustaining, long-term relationships. If you can learn to maintain your good manners at all times and in all places, your life will be easier and success will come sooner.


Today's Action Plan

Every culture has certain rules when it comes to manners. In China, for example, the American-style hearty handshake is considered rudely aggressive. On the other hand, a polite, proper Chinese handshake would seem non-committal or even insultingly uninterested to Americans. Still, there are certain common behaviors that should be avoided wherever you go:

1. Don't raise your voice. The trick to getting what you want in China is the same as it is anywhere else: persistence. Calmly pursuing your objective despite passivity or even resistance will eventually work for you, regardless of how difficult the circumstances are.

2. Don't be dismissive. All people, regardless of where they come from, want to be treated with courtesy and respect. Taking the time to look people in the eyes when you speak to them, to speak in a well-modulated tone, and to say "please" and "thank you" go a long way.

3. Don't be gloomy. We all cheer up when we are in the presence of cheerful people. If you want to get the best reaction out of the people you meet (even if it's for selfish reasons), smile at them.


It's Good to Know: Locating Files on Your Computer

By Suzanne Richardson

You may have a top-notch filing system, but even so it can be hard to locate a file in the impenetrable thicket of Word documents, e-mails, spreadsheets, MP3s, and photos on your computer. To quickly find what you're looking for, try one of these free desktop search engines:

  • Google Desktop: After forming an index of practically everything on your hard drive, Google Desktop allows you to search through them the way you'd do any Google search. It even brings up results in a Web browser, Google-style. And each time you go to Google to search for a subject, the search engine will tell you if you have related files on your computer, in your e-mail, or in your Web history.
  • Windows Desktop Search: Like Google Desktop, Windows Desktop indexes your hard drive. Instead of seeing your search results in a browser, you'll get them in a Windows application. You can sort your results by name, file type, author, or date, or filter them so you see only one type of file.
  • Copernic Desktop Search: Copernic works just like Google Desktop and Windows Desktop, but it allows you to specify your searches - narrowing down results to those from a certain sender, for instance. You can also search through e-mails and attachments from Outlook, Outlook Express, Mozilla Thunderbird, and Eudora.

(Source: Australian PC World)


* Advertisement *

How OPP (Other People's Panic) Is Making This Investor Wealthy

Whether your local real estate market is an Outrageous Bubble or an Incredible Bargain, you can quickly and safely make hundreds of thousands - even (or especially) while others are in a state of Panic.

Take a minute to see how deep-value investor Justin Ford is doing that, and how you can too, during a one-hour tele-seminar revealing The Secrets to Buying Cash Flow Properties at 25% below Market Value in Any Kind of Market.


Word to the Wise: Avaricious

"Avaricious" (av-uh-RISH-us) means greedy for wealth and/or power.

Example (as I used it today): "Since the war on terror began, our world image has definitely suffered. Our traditional image as well-meaning brats has morphed ominously into something more sinister: unprincipled, avaricious monsters."


Michael Masterson
Copyright ETR, LLC, 2006


Have a Question for Michael Masterson?

Want to know the secrets to his success? Have a perplexing business problem? ETR welcomes your thoughts. Post them online at http://speakoutforum.com/forum/ or send questions directly to Support@EarlyToRise.Com


ALL CONTENTS OF THIS E-MAIL ARE COPYRIGHT 2006 BY ETR, LLC.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED: REPRODUCING ANY PART OF THIS DOCUMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF EARLY TO RISE. Protected by U.S. Copyright Law {Title 17 U.S.C. Section 101 et seq., Title 18 U.S.C. Section 2319}:

Infringements can be punishable by up to 5 years in prison and $250,000 in fines. Are you having trouble receiving Early to Rise messages?

Ensure that Early to Rise gets delivered to your email box, click below:http://www.earlytorise.com/whitelisting.htm

If you'd like to suggest Early To Rise to a friend, please point them to:http://www.earlytorise.com/SuccessPartnership.htm

To BECOME AN EARLY TO RISE MEMBER, please visit: http://www.earlytorise.com/ or email support@earlytorise.com

NOTE: If URLs do not appear as live links in your e-mail program, please cut and paste the full URL into the location or address field of your browser. Disclaimer: The inclusion of an ad in ETR does not constitute an explicit endorsement. It does mean that as far as I know the product is not a rip-off. When I really like a product and want you to buy it I'll tell you explicitly. Otherwise, view these ads the way you would commercials on TV or display ads in the back of your favorite magazine. Check them out. Make a decision. If you don't like, ask for a refund. (All products sold here will carry refunds.)

Nothing in this e-mail should be considered personalized investment advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investment advice.We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security recommended to our readers.

All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation.Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

All material on this site is provided for information only and may not be construed as medical advice or instruction. No action should be taken based solely on the contents of this information; instead, readers should consult appropriate health professionals on any matter relating to their health and well-being.