<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 6 Steps to Getting Your Phone to Ring Off the Hook With New Clients</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.earlytorise.com/2008/08/15/6-steps-to-getting-your-phone-to-ring-off-the-hook-with-new-clients.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.earlytorise.com/2008/08/15/6-steps-to-getting-your-phone-to-ring-off-the-hook-with-new-clients.html</link>
	<description>The Web&#039;s Most Popular Newsletter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:45:21 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Beaird</title>
		<link>http://www.earlytorise.com/2008/08/15/6-steps-to-getting-your-phone-to-ring-off-the-hook-with-new-clients.html/comment-page-1#comment-1004</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Beaird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 19:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.earlytorise.com/?p=1860#comment-1004</guid>
		<description>I love spam!  How on Earth can I find out about something I did not already know about, if I reject all but those sources which I already know about?
If &quot;spam&quot; means &quot;unwanted email&quot;, then you cannot know in advance what total strangers do and don&#039;t want.  Send it to one and all and offer them a chance to not EVER get email from you again, the ol&#039; opt-out option.  That&#039;s polite enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love spam!  How on Earth can I find out about something I did not already know about, if I reject all but those sources which I already know about?<br />
If &#8220;spam&#8221; means &#8220;unwanted email&#8221;, then you cannot know in advance what total strangers do and don&#8217;t want.  Send it to one and all and offer them a chance to not EVER get email from you again, the ol&#8217; opt-out option.  That&#8217;s polite enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Copeland</title>
		<link>http://www.earlytorise.com/2008/08/15/6-steps-to-getting-your-phone-to-ring-off-the-hook-with-new-clients.html/comment-page-1#comment-996</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Copeland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 01:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.earlytorise.com/?p=1860#comment-996</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I have a question rather than a comment.  It may have been OK to send email letters to hundreds of prospects in 1979, but isn&#039;t this spam now?  

If I send out a handful (not hundreds) of email letters to introduce myself to prospects who might have a use for my service, and to let them know that I will be in their town in the next week, is this spam?  Would one such email be spam?

Michelle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I have a question rather than a comment.  It may have been OK to send email letters to hundreds of prospects in 1979, but isn&#8217;t this spam now?  </p>
<p>If I send out a handful (not hundreds) of email letters to introduce myself to prospects who might have a use for my service, and to let them know that I will be in their town in the next week, is this spam?  Would one such email be spam?</p>
<p>Michelle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
