<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO Don&#8217;t: Using Fancy Flash Designs for Your Site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.earlytorise.com/2008/07/07/seo-dont-using-fancy-flash-designs-for-your-site.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.earlytorise.com/2008/07/07/seo-dont-using-fancy-flash-designs-for-your-site.html</link>
	<description>The Web&#039;s Most Popular Newsletter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:45:21 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Fredric Barnes</title>
		<link>http://www.earlytorise.com/2008/07/07/seo-dont-using-fancy-flash-designs-for-your-site.html/comment-page-1#comment-2380</link>
		<dc:creator>Fredric Barnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 16:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.earlytorise.com/2008/07/07/seo-dont-using-fancy-flash-designs-for-your-site.html#comment-2380</guid>
		<description>Hi, I&#039;m looking around the web learning about Flash and SEO. And this post is just plain wrong.

Using any library that allows alternate content under the flash, and deeplinks in the flash, will make the search engines crawl your alternate content, while still providing full page flash for your customers.

This will enhance visitor experience, which leads to sales, while still providing a &quot;standard html&quot; page for search engines and visitors using phones or other browsers without javascript and/or flash.

Why deny yourself something, when you can have the best of both worlds?

Take a look at SWFAddress, it&#039;s free and easy to implement and makes all this possible. And there are other free scripts as well that you can find all over the web.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I&#8217;m looking around the web learning about Flash and SEO. And this post is just plain wrong.</p>
<p>Using any library that allows alternate content under the flash, and deeplinks in the flash, will make the search engines crawl your alternate content, while still providing full page flash for your customers.</p>
<p>This will enhance visitor experience, which leads to sales, while still providing a &#8220;standard html&#8221; page for search engines and visitors using phones or other browsers without javascript and/or flash.</p>
<p>Why deny yourself something, when you can have the best of both worlds?</p>
<p>Take a look at SWFAddress, it&#8217;s free and easy to implement and makes all this possible. And there are other free scripts as well that you can find all over the web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Kammerer</title>
		<link>http://www.earlytorise.com/2008/07/07/seo-dont-using-fancy-flash-designs-for-your-site.html/comment-page-1#comment-1307</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Kammerer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.earlytorise.com/2008/07/07/seo-dont-using-fancy-flash-designs-for-your-site.html#comment-1307</guid>
		<description>I feel that the information here will help me in designing and checking out new web sites I am influenced on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel that the information here will help me in designing and checking out new web sites I am influenced on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
